Snyk
Snyk is an AI native developer security platform providing SAST, SCA, container security, and infrastructure as code scanning with automated vulnerability fixing integrated into developer workflows.

About Snyk
Snyk is a developer first security platform founded in 2015 by Guy Podjarny, Danny Grander, and Assaf Hefetz, leveraging their experience from the Israel Defence Force's cyber intelligence unit. The platform is designed to seamlessly integrate security into the software development lifecycle, enabling developers to find, prioritize, and fix vulnerabilities without disrupting their workflow. Valued at $7.4 billion, Snyk serves over 1,200 companies including Google, Intuit, MongoDB, and Salesforce.
The Snyk AI Security Platform addresses modern application security challenges across multiple domains. Snyk Open Source provides software composition analysis for identifying vulnerabilities in open source dependencies. Snyk Code offers static application security testing with AI powered auto fixing capabilities. Snyk Container secures container images and Kubernetes environments, while Snyk Infrastructure as Code identifies misconfigurations in cloud deployments. The platform's DeepCode AI Engine delivers up to 80% accurate automated fixes directly in the IDE and pull requests, reducing time to remediate by 84% or more.
Key Features
- Snyk Open Source (SCA): Software composition analysis scanning vulnerabilities and license compliance issues in open source dependencies with automated fix pull requests.
- Snyk Code (SAST): Static application security testing with real time scanning, AI powered auto fixes, and 14+ language support including AI library coverage.
- Snyk Container: Container image and Kubernetes security scanning with base image recommendations and registry integration.
- Snyk Infrastructure as Code: Scanning Terraform, AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud configurations for security misconfigurations and drift management.
- DeepCode AI Fix: Automated vulnerability remediation with pre validated fixes delivered directly in IDE and pull requests.
- Risk Based Prioritization: Dynamic risk scoring combining CVSS, EPSS, exploit maturity, reachability, and business context for intelligent prioritization.
- Developer Native Integrations: Seamless integration with IDEs, Git repositories, CI/CD pipelines, and collaboration tools developers use daily.
- Continuous Monitoring: Automated daily monitoring for newly disclosed vulnerabilities across all projects and dependencies.
Pricing
-
Free: $0 Individual developers and small teams, 200 open source tests/month, 100 SAST tests/month, 300 IaC tests/month, 100 container tests/month, IDE plugins, cloud SCM integration, unlimited contributing developers.
-
Team: Custom pricing per contributing developer Up to 10 contributing developers, 1,000 open source tests/month, up to 1,000 SAST tests/month, unlimited IaC tests, unlimited container tests, Jira integration, standard support (next business day), license compliance.
-
Ignite: Custom pricing per contributing developer Up to 50 contributing developers, unlimited tests across all products, self hosted SCM support, private package registry integration, reports, SSO SAML, risk based prioritization, API access, 24x5 support.
-
Enterprise: Custom pricing Unlimited contributing developers, customizable plans, FedRAMP compliance, data residency options, enhanced support, audit logs, custom user roles, premium support and services available.
Use Cases
- Securing open source dependencies in modern application development
- Shifting security left with IDE integrated SAST scanning
- Container image security for cloud native deployments
- Infrastructure as code security for cloud configurations
- AI generated code security validation
- Enterprise DevSecOps program consolidation
Pros & Cons
Pros:
- Developer first approach with seamless workflow integration
- AI powered automated fixes reducing remediation time by 84%
- Comprehensive coverage across SCA, SAST, containers, and IaC
- Strong free tier for individual developers
- Real time scanning without build requirements
Cons:
- Pricing can be expensive for larger teams at enterprise scale
- Test limits on lower tier plans may constrain active development
- Some advanced features require Ignite or Enterprise plans
Integrations
GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure Repos, Jenkins, CircleCI, Travis CI, Docker Hub, Amazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Google Container Registry, Jira, Slack, VS Code, IntelliJ, Eclipse, Terraform Cloud, Kubernetes
FAQ
Last edited
March 8, 2026 at 6:44 AM by Venkatraman C
